Thursday 6 September 2012

Another step along a very long road

Oh dear.. It has been a while since I last wrote my blog….. life has been particularly hectic and everything else gets in the way of this.. but I guess that is real life taking precedence over a virtual one.. which is a good thing!




Having finished the conversations with the public around the possible reconfiguration of services around the Friarage hospital we have been completing the report and going through the various assurance processes necessary for the next phase a “gateway 0” review( which looks at the process) and a. NCAT review (which looks at the case for change etc). Both were very supportive and helpful. On of the things about the whole process that has surprised me is that so much of this we have had to learn as we go along. There doesn’t seem to be a blue print that guides you through, even though it has been done so many times before. Perhaps we will write one!



As a newly formed CCG, we struggled with the how do you get a really “clinically led” decision. There is the governing body of the group that has been given authority by the GPs to make some decisions in their behalf but this seemed like a really big recommendation so we wanted every fmaily doctor to have a voice.



So we decided to ask each practice to look at the three short listed options and score them according to various criteria ( these had been chosen previously by the governing body) and then each practice sent one of its members to a meeting of the GP council and all the scores were put together to come up with an overall score. There was a great deal of agreement between practices around the scoring of each option and we came to a decision everyone there felt comfortable with. We then went back and phoned the few practices who couldn’t come, and checked out the results with them..



It is now my job to talk to our partners about the recommendations the GPS have made, in the end it just another step along a very long road…. From here we go to the PCT board then through an assurance process by the strategic Health authority (management tier above the PCT and below the National Commissioning Board) and then probably out to formal consultation with the public….



We have had a few people telling us they are concerned about everything being aired so publically. I think it is absolutely how we should do things. We have made some “rookie” mistakes along the way because we are learning and there are polished operators out there who love to trip us up every time we falter. My only response is that we are trying to do the right thing and we will go on doing that. Hopefully we wont make the same mistake more than once.



I am learning fast…It feels like a long and challenging process but then it should be. It is a big change and will affect people so it is important that it is rigorous, open and challenging.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks very much for posting this - very informative to hear from the GP / CCG perspective. I think absolutely right about openness, but this seems difficult when reforms focus everyone's minds at the strategic level.

    My question is - did you involve patient representatives (or health charities etc) at an early stage, or will this be part of public consultation?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Neil, thanks for this. Yes we involved local Links, and our patient and public group ( our Health Engagement Network) and the voluntary sector representatives from the outset.We also invited them and the facebook campaign people to join our stakeholder group. WE also had many conversations with the public at public meetings, focus groups, and we had an on line questionnaire.Vicky

    ReplyDelete